In the Washington Post this week, you may have seen an op/ed piece authored by a number of superintendents, chancellors, chief executives, and the like about “How to Fix our schools.” Notably, no teacher was listed in their 16-name byline. And, coincidentally enough, it mostly centered on reducing teachers’ rights and increasing administrators’ rights. As a former teacher and education professional, here’s my point by point response.
|
The Washington Post Op/Ed |
Laura |
|
· Teacher Quality has the biggest impact upon student achievement. |
|
|
· Teacher promotion and retention is based upon archaic rules of seniority and academic credentials. The widespread policy of “last in, first out” makes it hard to hold on the new, enthusiastic educators and ignores the one thing that should matter most: performance. |
|
|
· These archaic rules contribute to the inability to hire new quality teachers. |
|
|
· District leaders need the authority to use financial incentives to attract and retain the best teacher. |
|
|
· Financial incentives will help us retain quality teachers. |
|
|
We must also make charter schools a truly viable option. |
|
|
· We can’t expect teachers to meet the needs of 25 to 30 students in a classroom. |
|
|
· We must use technology to collect data on student learning and shape individualized instruction. |
Finally, with all this talk of teacher accountability, what about principal accountability? What about parent accountability? We must all work together and support one another to educate our next generation of citizens. |
|
The Washington Post Op/Ed |
Laura |
|
· Teacher Quality has the biggest impact upon student achievement. |
· Agreed |
|
· Teacher promotion and retention is based upon archaic rules of seniority and academic credentials. The widespread policy of “last in, first out” makes it hard to hold on the new, enthusiastic educators and ignores the one thing that should matter most: performance. |
· How do we measure teacher performance? With student test scores? What about a teacher that has the most challenging students (and I have seen principals funnel the most discipline-challenging kids into the classrooms of teachers they wanted to get rid of). Where’s the accountability for the students and parents in that? · Without an objective measure of teacher performance, without seniority rules, promotion becomes based on favoritism with the principal – without tenured teachers, everyone is afraid to stand up to a principal that may not be making the right decisions. This happens. · You can have all the enthusiasm, good intentions, and love of children in the world – you can commit hours of extra time, which is what I did my first year. But enthusiasm does not equal skill. Practice equals skills, which is why we promote those who have been around longer. I worked fewer hours my second year than my first, and I got better results, in terms of MCAS scores. |
|
· These archaic rules contribute to the inability to hire new quality teachers. |
· The teacher labor force is set. I heartily agree that there is a kind of quality-teacher labor shortage – or, if there were more quality teachers, then we would have more flexibility. If you lay off all the teachers in Malden, where are they going to go? There’s no influx of new teachers waiting to take their spots. They’ll just get rehired in a neighboring town. · The solution is to make it easier to enter the teaching profession, so that we have more high quality candidates. University teacher preparation programs are one of the biggest rackets around. For those who don’t know: o To be a certified teacher and teacher in a public school – which includes charters – you have to complete a state recognized university preparation program, which are costly both in terms of time and money. o These preparation programs have candidates student teach at the end – so you don’t even know if you’ll enjoy teaching before you invest all that money. o The state doesn’t honor non-traditional paths of gaining teaching experience, such as the Breakthrough Collaborative or teaching in non-profits or private schools. o All this means that smart people, including those with teaching experience, are blocked from entering the teaching profession, limiting our hiring options and denying kids access to high quality teachers. |
|
· District leaders need the authority to use financial incentives to attract and retain the best teachers. |
· Teachers are not necessarily motivated by profit. Can I get some comments from friends in the human services profession? People are motivated by different things, which often determines their profession: o Profit-motivated individuals work in sales o Product-motivated individuals, such as writers and carpenters, get satisfaction from creating tangible, high quality finished work. o Knowledge-motivated people, like scientists, are driven by discovering new things. o Social-impact motivated people, like teachers and social workers, are driven by the difference they can create in the world and in individual people’s lives. Each of these types need different kinds of incentives. · I already worked as hard as I could as a teacher, because I knew I could help these kids cross the barrier to a high school diploma. If I’m already working at capacity, how is rewarding me financially going to have any impact on my work? · Not every successful enterprise has to have a business model, and I don’t know why we keep insisting on forcing this model onto organizations unnaturally. The business model is good for businesses. The university model is good for universities. My Vice President in China, an Australian man, once said that industries have just as much to learn from non-profits. |
|
· Financial incentives will help us retain quality teachers. |
· Teachers leave more often because of poor working conditions, not because of finances. These working conditions are: o Student Discipline. It takes a while to learn how to deal with challenging students. Parents and administrators often provide no support in this regard, failing to back up teachers’ decisions and stick to a behavior plan. There’s loads of professional development around notebooks, reading strategies, cross-cultural sensitivity, but very little around behavior management, the most fundamental skill. o Lack of Resources. Please keep your performance bonus. Instead, give me a copy machine that works so I don’t argue with my co-workers, provide me with notebooks and dry erase markers that work, text books that are level appropriate, white boards that don’t fall on me during the lesson. There is so much unnecessary stress around material; providing resources is one lesson that schools can learn from the for-profit world. No one has to take up a collection for paper clips at companies. o Poor Leadership. Micro-management, individual harassment, lack of recognition, not being treated as a professional – all the problems of a modern work place happen in schools, but they are felt so much more acutely by teachers, whose lives often revolve around their school. |
|
· We must also make charter schools a truly viable option. |
· Charter Schools are Laboratories – they aren’t solutions. Charter Schools were created for the scientist-teacher. They free schools from traditional rules so that they could experiment to see what works in education. Those individual lessons should be brought into mainstream schools. As with any experiment, they find things that don’t work, too, and we shouldn’t be replicated that. · Three out of five charter schools do not outperform mainstream schools. Two of those three underperform. This is to be expected, since they are experimental schools. But they aren’t an alternative to mainstream schools. · Charter Schools aren’t sustainable. They often have an influx of cash that isn’t part of the city budget, they have teachers who work an abundance of over time, and in some districts without lottery systems, they take the best students. These aren’t replicable. |
|
· We can’t expect teachers to meet the needs of 25 to 30 students in a classroom. |
· Class size matters – in the US. When Matt and I taught middle school on the weekends in China, we had 50 to 60 students in a classroom – but they were all perfectly behaved, actually did pair-and-share conversation activities with their partners, were eager to learn and on task. I certainly didn’t change as a teacher – clearly it is something that parents and schools are doing to instill a sense of personal responsibility for learning and behavioral norms. It takes a village to raise a child – and that village isn’t just teachers; it includes parents. |
|
· We must use technology to collect data on student learning and shape individualized instruction. |
· I agree. Project-based work is in the vogue, and standardized testing is the ugly step child of “authentic assessment.” Imagine, however, if, throughout the year instead of right before summer vacation like the MCAS, we could quickly determine how much students understand, and aggregate that data to impact our re-teaching. Standardized interim assessments let us do that efficiently, without demanding too much time on learning or teacher preparation time. This is the kind of work I’m doing with the Achievement Network. |




